Diminished Value Claims for Auto Accident Cases — Maximizing Your Recovery

I recently settled a client’s auto accident case. Not only was she injured, her car was damaged as well. In many auto accident cases, the plaintiff handles the property (car) damage case directly with the insurance company, whether his or her own or the defendant driver’s, and leaves the personal injury component to the attorney. Auto property damage is usually not litigated because there is often not a lot of question about the value and the plaintiff needs the car repaired quickly. Assuming insurance covers the damage and repairs to the car, the plaintiff is still not fully compensated for the loss. The reason is that a car, no matter how well repaired, is worth less after it is involved in a collision. Should the plaintiff attempt to sell the car, he or she would not be able to receive as much had the car not been involved in the collision. In a situation in which another driver is responsible for the accident and the ensuing personal injuries and property damage, it follows that the defendant driver should be responsible for the reduction in the car’s resale value.

Connecticut and many other states have a cause of action under common law that addresses this issue. It is known as a diminished value claim. The DV claim (not to be confused with domestic violence on the criminal side) entered Connecticut case law in 1944 with the case Littlejohn v. Elionsky, 130 Conn. 541 (1944). Littlejohn and its progeny, which includes Stults v. Palmer, 141 Conn. 709 (1954) and Damico v. Dalton, 1 Conn. App. 186 (1984), hold that a defendant is liable for the diminished value of a plaintiff’s vehicle which is calculated as the difference between the vehicle’s value before the accident and the value after the accident. Market value is used.

I owe it to myself to tell you, if you’re looking for a car that will decrease in value, the Wagon Queen Family Truckster…You think you hate it now, wait ’til you drive it.

My client and her car were rear-ended on I-95. Liability was clear. My client recovered from her injuries. The car did not. Although the body was repaired, the frame was bent. Damages were extensive but the car was not totaled. Frame damage makes a car difficult to sell and often at only a fraction of its pre-accident value. The way we prosecuted the DV claim was to have an auto appraiser appraise the car and then submit the DV demand with our personal injury demand to the defendant driver’s insurance company. We were able to resolve the case without filing suit. Such cases however can be litigated in court with the personal injury case. It is important to note that even though the client accepted an insurance payment for the repairs of the car, she was still able to recover the diminished value afterward. Diminished value claims are only available against a defendant (and through his or her insurance) and not a plaintiff’s own collision policy.

Not only did the Blues Brothers go to jail for their exploits, they were hit for a huge diminished value judgment for all of the police cars that were damaged in their car chase. That included both actual damages and bribes to Cook County officials.

The DV claim is one of many examples of why it helps to have a lawyer handle your accident case. An attorney will know what claims are available and maximize your recovery. It is true that a person can settle his or her own case with the opposing insurance company. Insurance companies love that. Your damages in a case are always more than your bills and you should be compensated for them. In my next post, I will explain that concept as it relates to insurance premiums.

Chris DeMatteo is an attorney and the sole member of DeMatteo Legal Solutions at 2911 Dixwell Ave., Ste. B10, Hamden, CT. Call (203) 691-6594 or visit the office website. Attorney DeMatteo represents clients in criminal, juvenile and civil matters in all of Connecticut's courts.

151 thoughts on “Diminished Value Claims for Auto Accident Cases — Maximizing Your Recovery”

  1. Pingback: URL
  2. Pingback: More Bonuses
  3. Pingback: but facebbok likes
  4. Pingback: jbzscmngbvsbbfbghv
  5. Pingback: csvghrtnfhgsvjb
  6. Pingback: urlman 9990mine
  7. Pingback: throne rush hack
  8. Pingback: erection pills
  9. Pingback: Unlock iPhone
  10. Pingback: James Vallecillo
  11. Pingback: fitflop usa
  12. Pingback: cheap web hosting
  13. Pingback: Trackback
  14. Pingback: iPhone Unlocking
  15. Pingback: www.gtavcc.com
  16. Pingback: Trackback
  17. Pingback: Trackback
  18. Pingback: elocon vs. elidel
  19. Pingback: worpress themes
  20. Pingback: Trackback
  21. Pingback: laptop reviews
  22. Pingback: dealing impotence
  23. Pingback: herbs impotence
  24. Pingback: Trackback
  25. Pingback: diet meal delivery
  26. Pingback: dropshippers
  27. Pingback: Adult stories
  28. Pingback: kwatery szczyrk
  29. Pingback: biale panele
  30. Pingback: design templates
  31. Pingback: wózki xlander
  32. Pingback: buffalo web design
  33. Pingback: erection remedies
  34. Pingback: Facebook.com
  35. Pingback: renova ask patient
  36. Pingback: depilacja laserowa
  37. Pingback: program partnerski
  38. Pingback: Herpes Cure
  39. Pingback: lets head
  40. Pingback: Trackback
  41. Pingback: likes
  42. Pingback: lunatik promo code
  43. Pingback: lunatik promo code
  44. Pingback: vimax
  45. Pingback: ed med
  46. Pingback: Trackback
  47. Pingback: paznokcie
  48. Pingback: kliknij
  49. Pingback: miernik lakieru
  50. Pingback: przepisy kulinarne
  51. Pingback: pontony
  52. Pingback: kvit smøgerne
  53. Pingback: What is F4X?
  54. Pingback: hosting
  55. Pingback: Photography
  56. Pingback: depilacja laserowa
  57. Pingback: cialis
  58. Pingback: ed treatment
  59. Pingback: Education
  60. Pingback: iherb.com coupon
  61. Pingback: allhamptonbay.com
  62. Pingback: www.mykunci.com
  63. Pingback: iherb coupon code
  64. Pingback: ucdbookstore.us
  65. Pingback: chsservicesinc.us
  66. Pingback: projekty przylacza
  67. Pingback: Niacin

Comments are closed.